Off-Road Mufflers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
An off-road vehicle is
considered to be any type of vehicle which is capable
of driving on and
off paved or gravel surface.[1] It is generally characterized by having large tires with deep, open treads
and a flexible suspension, or even caterpillar tracks.[citation needed] Other vehicles that do not travel public streets or highways are generally
termed off-highway vehicles, which would include tractors, forklifts, cranes, backhoes, bulldozers and Golf carts.[citation needed]
Off-road vehicles have an enthusiastic following because of
their many uses and versatility. Several types of motorsports involve racing
off-road vehicles. The three largest "4 wheel vehicle" off-road types of competitions are Rally, Desert Racing, andRockcrawling.[citation needed] The three largest types of All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) / Motorcyclecompetitions are Motocross, Enduro, and also Desert Racing like Dakar Rallye and Baja 1000.[citation needed] The most common use of these vehicles is for sight seeing in areas
distant from pavement. The use of higher clearance and higher traction
vehicles enables access on trails and forest roads that have
rough and low traction surfaces.
History
One of the first modified off-road vehicles was
the Kégresse track, a conversion undertaken first by Adolphe Kégresse, who designed the original while working
for Tsar Nicholas II of Russia between 1906 and 1916.[2] The
system uses an unusual caterpillar track which uses a flexible belt rather than interlocking metal segments. It can
be fitted to a conventional car or truck to turn it into a half-track, suitable for use over rough or soft ground. Conventional front
wheels and steering are used.
After the Russian Revolution of 1917 Kégresse returned to his native France where the system was
used on Citroën cars between
1921 and 1937 for off-road and military vehicles. The Citroën company sponsored several overland
expeditions with their vehicles crossing North Africa and Central Asia.
After World War II a huge
surplus of light off-road vehicles like the Jeep and heavier lorries were
available on the market.[citation needed] The Jeeps in particular were popular with buyers who used them
as utility vehicles. This was also the start of off-roading as a hobby.
The wartime Jeeps soon wore out, though, and the Jeep company started to produce civilian derivatives, closely
followed by similar vehicles from British Land Rover and Japanese Toyota, Datsun/Nissan and Mitsubishi. These were all alike; small, compact four wheel drives with at
most a small hardtop to protect the occupants from the elements.[citation needed]
From the 1960s more comfortable vehicles were
produced.[citation needed] First they were popular for many years with rural buyers due to their
off-road and load-lugging capabilities.[citation needed] The U.S. Jeep Wagoneer and
the Ford Bronco, the British Range Rover and
thestation wagon-bodied Japanese Toyota Land Cruiser and Nissan Patrol were
essentially a station wagon body on a light truck frame
withfour wheel drive drivetrain. Later during the nineties manufacturers started to add even
more luxuries to bring those off-road vehicles on par with regular cars. This eventually evolved into what we
call the SUV today, and the
newer Crossover vehicle where utility and off-road capability was sacrificed for better on-road
handling and luxury.
Technical
Swedish Hägglunds Bv206 with
wide rubber tracks
To be able to drive off the pavement, off-road vehicles need
several characteristics: They need to have a low ground pressure, so not to sink in soft ground, they
need ground clearance to
not get hung up on obstacles and they need to keep their wheels or tracks on the ground so as to not lose
traction.[citation needed]
Wheeled vehicles accomplish this by having a suitable
balance of large or additional tires and tall and flexible suspension.
Tracked vehicles accomplish this by having wide tracks and a flexible suspension on the road
wheels.[citation needed]
The choice of wheels versus tracks are one of cost and
suitability. A tracked drivetrain is more expensive and costly in terms of maintenance. Wheeled drivetrains are
cheaper and give a higher top speed. For pure off-road capabilities the tracked drivetrain has the
edge.[citation needed]
Most off-road vehicles are fitted with
especially low gearing.[citation needed] This allows the operator to make the most of the engine'savailable power, while moving through challenging terrain slowly.
A combustion engine coupled to a normal gearbox often has a too high
output speed to be usable. The vehicle often has one of two things; either a very low ("granny") first gear
(like the all wheel driveVolkswagen Transporter versions) or an additional gearbox in-line with the first, called
a reduction drive. Some vehicles, like the Bv206 in the picture on the
right, also has a torque converter to
further reduce the gearing.[3]
Many wheeled off road vehicles have all wheel drive, to keep traction on slippery surfaces, although in
vehicles designed for use both on and off road, this may be switchable so that the vehicle has fewer driven
wheels when on the road.
Criticism of off-road vehicles
Safety
SUVs are built
with higher ground clearance for off-road use and have a
higher center of gravity,[4] therefore increasing the risk of rollover. Research has shown that whenever
an SUV turns, the vehicle's mass resists the turn and carries the weight forward allowing the traction from the
tires to create a lateral centripetal force as the vehicle continues through the turn. The conflict between the
top weight of the SUV's desire to
go straight while the friction of
the tires on the road cause the bottom of the
vehicle to move away and out from under the vehicle during a turn.[5]
Pickups and SUVs are
more likely to be in rollover accident than passenger cars. According to a study conducted in the United States,
pickups have twice the fatality rate of cars and SUVs have nearly triple the fatality rate in rollover
accidents.[6] Of vehicles in the US, light trucks (includes SUVs) represent 36 percent of all registered vehicles. They are involved in about
half of the fatal two-vehicle crashes with passenger cars, 80 percent of these fatalities are to occupants of
the passenger cars.[6]
Environment
In the United States, the number of ORV users since 1972 has
climbed sevenfold—from five million to 36 million in 2000.[7] Government policies that protect wilderness but also allow recreational ORV
use have been the subject of some debate within the United States and other countries.[8]
All trail and off-trail activities impact natural vegetation and
wildlife, which can lead to erosion and invasive species, habitat loss, and ultimately species loss,[9][10] which decreases an ecosystem's ability to maintain homeostasis. [11] ORVs cause greater stress to the environment than foot traffic alone, and ORV
operators who attempt to test their vehicles against natural obstacles can do significantly more damage then
those who follow legal trails.[12][13] Illegal use of off-road vehicles (ORV) has been identified as a
serious land management problem ranked with dumping garbage and other forms
of vandalism.[14] Many user organizations, such as Tread Lightly!and the Sierra Club, publish and encourage appropriate trail ethics.[15]
ORVs have also been criticized for producing more pollution
in areas that might normally have none. In addition to noise pollution that
can cause hearing impairment and stress in wildlife,[16] according to the U.S. Forest Service, old-style two-stroke engines (no longer a component of new off-road vehicles, although some are still in
use) "emit about 20 to 33 percent of the consumed fuel through the exhaust" and "discharge from two-stroke
snowmobile engines can lead to indirect pollutant deposition into the top layer of snow and subsequently into
the associated surface and ground water."[17][18] In 2002, the United States Environmental Protection
Agency adopted emissions standards for all-terrain vehicles
that "when fully implemented in 2012... are expected to prevent the release of more than two million tons
of air pollution each year
-- the equivalent of removing the pollution from more than 32 million cars every year."[19][20]
Common off-road vehicles
Common commercial off-road vehicles include four wheel
drive pickup trucks like
the Ford F-Series,GMC Sierra, Toyota Hilux, Dodge Ram and similar. Also
common are light trucks with station wagon-like bodies, which have been very popular since the
1980s. These include Chevrolet Blazer, Dodge Ramcharger, Ford Bronco, Jeep Cherokee, International Scout,Isuzu Trooper, Isuzu Rodeo, Isuzu Amigo, Land Rover Defender, Discovery, Suzuki Grand Vitara, Range Rover, Nissan Patrol, Nissan Xterra, Lada Niva, Land Cruiser and 4Runner. The Suzuki Samurai is also a
great off road vehicle that can be built much cheaper than many others. A number of those models have now become
luxury SUV's with much reduced off-road capability.
A number of military vehicles have also seen civilian use, including the Jeep CJ and AM GeneralHummer. Some, like the early Land Rovers, were adapted to military use from civilian
specifications.
Specialised commonly available off-road vehicles
include ATVs, or All Terrain Vehicles, dirt bikes, dune buggies, rock crawlers and sandrails.
A typical ATV. The ergonomics are
very similar to motorcycles, with a saddle and handlebar.
|
Heavily modified Chevrolet Blazer
typical of the United States hobbyistoff-roading scene
|
|
|
Commercial, military and less common off-road vehicles
European militaries and
utilities have used Land Rover Defenders, Haflingers, Pinzgauers and Mercedes-Benz Unimogs for all-terrain
transportation. Less common is the Portuguese UMM Alter.
The military market for off-road vehicles used to be large,
but since the fall of the Iron Curtain in the
1990s it has to some extent dried up. The U.S. Jeep, developed during World War II, coined the word many people use for any type of light
off-road vehicle. In the U.S., the Jeep's successor from the 1980s on was the AM General HMMWV. The Eastern Bloc used the GAZ-69 and UAZ-469 in similar roles.
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental marsh buggy, 1928,
stuck in mud.
|
References
- ^ "Off-Road Vehicle Act" (Web). New
Brunswick Acts and regulations. Attorney General, New Brunswick, Canada. Assented to June 27,
1985. Retrieved 2007-10-17.
- ^ MiG-registeret
- ^ Pakistan Military Consortium
- ^ Rodney E. Slater (U.S. Transportation Secretary) (April 9, 1998). "Secretary Slater Proposes New Label; Warning of Rollover Danger for Sport Utility
Vehicles." (Web). News Release. National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. Retrieved 2007-05-17.
- ^ C Johnson, Physicist, Physics Degree from Univ of Chicago (April 25,
2007). "The Physics of SUV Rollover Accidents" (Web). This
presentation will describe the physics (and math) of what occurs, for NON-physicist-types!. Public
Service Projects Index. Retrieved 2007-05-19.
- ^ a b Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D. (Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration) (February 26, 2003). "The Honorable Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D. Administrator National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration Before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation United States
Senate" (Web). Testimony before the Committee on Commerce, Science, And
Transportation, United States Senate. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved 2007-05-17.
- ^ "Forest Service Rule Revs Up Off-Road Vehicle Fight" (Web). Article. Environment News Service (ENS). July 8,
2004. Retrieved 2007-06-24.
- ^ van Wagtendonk, Jan W. (2003). "Role of Science in Sustainable Management of Yosemite Wilderness" (PDF). USDA
Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-27. 2003. USDA Forest Service.
Retrieved 2007-06-24.
- ^ Mojave lizard may rate protection - The U.S. will study whether the Mojave fringe-toed
lizard, which scientists say is being damaged by off-road vehicles in its habitat, merits federal
protection
- ^ Officials seek to protect desert reptile - Mojave fringe-toed lizard at risk from people
in off-road vehicles
- ^ "Technical Notes" (PDF). Conserving
Natural and Cultural Resources on Department of Defense Lands; Case Studies from the DoD Conservation
Program (Page 13). US Department of Defense. 2004. Retrieved
2007-06-24.
- ^ Kristine Sowl and Rick Poetter (April 16, 2004). "Impact Analysis of Off-Road Vehicle Use for Subsistence Purposes on Refuge: Lands and
Resources Adjacent to the King Cove Access Project" (PDF). Izembek
National Wildlife Refuge (page 6). US Fish and wildlife services Alaska. Retrieved 2007-06-24.
- ^ "Recreation Management Goals and Strategies" (PDF). Capitol
State Forest Recreation and Public Use Plan—Part II (Page 45). Washington State Department of
Natural Resources. Retrieved 2007-06-24.
- ^ "Chapter 11. Field Management Status" (Web). Land
Management (11.5.2 Identified Concerns of the Parks Department). Central Pine Barrens Joint Planning
and Policy Commission. Retrieved 2007-06-24.
- ^ "Codes of Ethics Advocated by Groups Outside of Ontario" (Web). Trail
Ethics. Trent University. January 16, 2007. Retrieved
2007-06-24.
- ^ The Impacts of Off-Road Vehicle Noise on Wildlife
- ^ United States Forest Service - Environment and Effects
- ^ [http://wilderness.org/content/addressing-ecological-effects-road-vehicles
Addressing the Ecological Effects of Off-Road Vehicles]
- ^ "New Air Pollution Rules Target Off Road Vehicles" (Web). Article. Environment News Service (ENS). September 17,
2002. Retrieved 2007-06-24.
- ^ "Final Rule for Cleaner Large Industrial Spark-Ignition Engines, Recreational Marine
Diesel Engines, and Recreational Vehicles"(Web). US Environmental Protection Agency. March 6,
2006. Retrieved 2007-06-24.
Text taken as-is from Wikipedia and conforms to the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
License
|